Can you read this?

[JK Walz]

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by itslef but the wrod as a wlohe.

Jsaon K. Wlaz

[gilsinger]

Yes I can decipher that without any more difficulty than normal reading. That's an interesting bit of info.

[Ben@HFY]

Hi JK-

Interesting piece of research. Indeed, no problem to read it. It did some additional research myself . . . by letting a spelling-checker review your text.

The results are a little disappointing . . . even switching to another language doesn't help! Hmmm . . .

cu

Ben

[JamesHFYofAZ]

Taht is smoe cool suftf ddue!

[ShawnMiller]

that research only pertains to people who are proficient readers. you have to first learn waht the wrod loks lik too knwo how to read it.