Savi
04-17-2006, 10:34 PM
I'd like to start a new thread on the philosophy of our wonderful system Hung Fa Yi Wing Chun Kuen. I was inspired by David Bowman's essay posted in "Fau Kiu, Too!!!" and wish to present it here. My acknowledgement is below.
Originally posted by David Bowman:
Saam Mo Kiu
Style and the Three Connecting Bridges
Saam Mo Kiu
The popularity of martial arts in the U.S. has created a conceptual separation of activities that historically didn’t exist in the Shaolin Temples.
One only has to take a ride around any major metropolitan area to see example after example of martial arts specialization. These observations are further enhanced by picking-up any martial arts magazine extolling the next greatest style or long lost hidden secret that is better than anything that has come before it.
From a western business perspective this is understandable; create a niche and market its uniqueness. From a martial arts perspective this approach confuses those that approach martial arts from a more sophisticated understanding than a consumer product approach.
The ultimate purpose for studying martial arts is to recognize and deal with all aspects of reality as it exits not as we want it to exist. This understanding of reality takes on three distinct stages that apply regardless of whether we’re talking about emotional, intellectual, or physical reality.
Samm Mo Kiu is the process for recognizing reality and our journeys through it. It’s important to mention that there is no such thing as a good or bad stage of reality. Reality is always changing therefore we must change with it. This is not a matter of good/bad, right/wrong, it just is. The other thing to mention is that the journey through the stages is not a one time event. Because reality is always changing and our perspectives become more developed, we go back through the stages again and again. Part of this maturation process is being able to honestly assess what stage we’re in at any given time.
The bridges that help us to form our perspectives are Fau Kiu, Saan Kiu, and Weng Kiu; Fau Kiu is the first stage of development in which one is not even aware that our understanding of reality has changed. If the physics of reality can be described as the interactive elements of time, space, and energy, than a Fau Kiu person is one in which there is no physical context to their thoughts and movements.
Again, this is not a bad stage to be, it’s simply a necessary part of a constantly changing world and our understanding of it. The world being flat is a perfect analogy for Fau Kiu perspective. This perspective though historically accepted widely as fact is one devoid of any awareness of reality. The person or persons who first point out this change in understanding of reality risks being labeled a heretic.
Saan Kiu is the stage of development which is characterized by a strong reliance on collecting data from all of our senses. We’re seeing new things, we’re thinking of things a little bit differently and we’re physically doing things differently. This is sometimes described as an awareness stage in the sense that we know something in our perspective has changed but we can’t quite find a context to place all the new data. In this stage we somehow recognize that there are holes in our existing paradigms but we’re not sure what to do with the data that is an exception to our current understanding. These people are early adopters or pioneers in accepting the new reality. This is especially true for people who have a vested interest in the status quo, but can see enough exceptions to the current understanding to know that a new perspective is needed. One may not understand all the ramifications of the new reality, but they believe that it’s a more complete perspective than the one currently in use.
There are some caveats that apply to this stage. One is traditionally trained in Saan Kiu while simultaneously being introduced to how they connect to a Weng Kiu perspective. The tendency is to think in terms of Weng Kiu is good and anything that is not Weng Kiu is not useful and may even be viewed as bad. This introduction to Weng Kiu is a natural part of the training progression and though at times it may be more interesting due to its preciseness it does not signify the end of the Saan Kiu stage of training. It’s a natural human tendency for us to think of ourselves in the highest of terms, but in the realities of martial arts there is a huge difference in being able to mimic Weng Kiu methods and truly understanding all aspects of our physical reality.
A good analogy for this would be that someone who likes to drive his sports car very fast and is a good driver whenever he takes it out on winding country roads. Even though the person has a lot of skill and can relate to and even use many of the same driving techniques seen on the NASCAR circuit, this is not the same as strapping into a state of the art race car and run on a track at over 200 miles per hour with 30 others doing the same thing.
Weng Kiu represents a stage of development that is characterized by a complete mastery of one’s own elements of reality (time, space, and energy), but also that of their opponents. This is a very transient stage in that things are always changing. One only has a single chance to respond perfectly to a given place in time and space. Weng Kiu is described as being completely efficient, which means that nothing could be added or subtracted to a given response.
A universal understanding of this stage is what differentiates a Weng Kiu perspective from the Saan Kiu early adapter. Weng Kiu is represented as an enlightened understanding of all parts of the whole and the entirety of what the whole represents. It also represents an ability to physically express all principles and concepts without any preconceived notion of intent or preferences. This is a complete mastery of the current reality which is not the same as being introduced or even perfecting components of the new reality.
In summary, the Three Connecting Bridges gives us a medium for viewing our changing world. This Saam Mo Kiu perspective provides us a way to look at the reality of human form and function relative to any conflict (mental, physical, emotional) and break away from a styles perspective to focus on the universality of what it means to be human.
Secondly, the three stages are natural and qualitatively neutral. We can train to a Weng Kiu level without being Weng Kiu. We can appreciate the skills and body methods of Saan Kiu while simultaneously recognizing the difference between Saan Kiu methods and a Weng Kiu approach even though we haven’t fully achieved Weng Kiu. We can also point out a Fau Kiu perspective without demeaning or devaluing the person.
My wish is for people to develop a deeper meaning for their lives through the practice of martial arts regardless of style or approach. I hope that this post helps at least one person view their journey with a little different perspective.
David Bowman
Kalamazoo, MI
I have an essay that I wrote about the Hung Fa Yi philo back in February, and your essay inspired me to revisit mine. I decided to revise it and want to share it here as well. I want to thank you for sharing your wonderful essay with all of us.
Originally posted by David Bowman:
Saam Mo Kiu
Style and the Three Connecting Bridges
Saam Mo Kiu
The popularity of martial arts in the U.S. has created a conceptual separation of activities that historically didn’t exist in the Shaolin Temples.
One only has to take a ride around any major metropolitan area to see example after example of martial arts specialization. These observations are further enhanced by picking-up any martial arts magazine extolling the next greatest style or long lost hidden secret that is better than anything that has come before it.
From a western business perspective this is understandable; create a niche and market its uniqueness. From a martial arts perspective this approach confuses those that approach martial arts from a more sophisticated understanding than a consumer product approach.
The ultimate purpose for studying martial arts is to recognize and deal with all aspects of reality as it exits not as we want it to exist. This understanding of reality takes on three distinct stages that apply regardless of whether we’re talking about emotional, intellectual, or physical reality.
Samm Mo Kiu is the process for recognizing reality and our journeys through it. It’s important to mention that there is no such thing as a good or bad stage of reality. Reality is always changing therefore we must change with it. This is not a matter of good/bad, right/wrong, it just is. The other thing to mention is that the journey through the stages is not a one time event. Because reality is always changing and our perspectives become more developed, we go back through the stages again and again. Part of this maturation process is being able to honestly assess what stage we’re in at any given time.
The bridges that help us to form our perspectives are Fau Kiu, Saan Kiu, and Weng Kiu; Fau Kiu is the first stage of development in which one is not even aware that our understanding of reality has changed. If the physics of reality can be described as the interactive elements of time, space, and energy, than a Fau Kiu person is one in which there is no physical context to their thoughts and movements.
Again, this is not a bad stage to be, it’s simply a necessary part of a constantly changing world and our understanding of it. The world being flat is a perfect analogy for Fau Kiu perspective. This perspective though historically accepted widely as fact is one devoid of any awareness of reality. The person or persons who first point out this change in understanding of reality risks being labeled a heretic.
Saan Kiu is the stage of development which is characterized by a strong reliance on collecting data from all of our senses. We’re seeing new things, we’re thinking of things a little bit differently and we’re physically doing things differently. This is sometimes described as an awareness stage in the sense that we know something in our perspective has changed but we can’t quite find a context to place all the new data. In this stage we somehow recognize that there are holes in our existing paradigms but we’re not sure what to do with the data that is an exception to our current understanding. These people are early adopters or pioneers in accepting the new reality. This is especially true for people who have a vested interest in the status quo, but can see enough exceptions to the current understanding to know that a new perspective is needed. One may not understand all the ramifications of the new reality, but they believe that it’s a more complete perspective than the one currently in use.
There are some caveats that apply to this stage. One is traditionally trained in Saan Kiu while simultaneously being introduced to how they connect to a Weng Kiu perspective. The tendency is to think in terms of Weng Kiu is good and anything that is not Weng Kiu is not useful and may even be viewed as bad. This introduction to Weng Kiu is a natural part of the training progression and though at times it may be more interesting due to its preciseness it does not signify the end of the Saan Kiu stage of training. It’s a natural human tendency for us to think of ourselves in the highest of terms, but in the realities of martial arts there is a huge difference in being able to mimic Weng Kiu methods and truly understanding all aspects of our physical reality.
A good analogy for this would be that someone who likes to drive his sports car very fast and is a good driver whenever he takes it out on winding country roads. Even though the person has a lot of skill and can relate to and even use many of the same driving techniques seen on the NASCAR circuit, this is not the same as strapping into a state of the art race car and run on a track at over 200 miles per hour with 30 others doing the same thing.
Weng Kiu represents a stage of development that is characterized by a complete mastery of one’s own elements of reality (time, space, and energy), but also that of their opponents. This is a very transient stage in that things are always changing. One only has a single chance to respond perfectly to a given place in time and space. Weng Kiu is described as being completely efficient, which means that nothing could be added or subtracted to a given response.
A universal understanding of this stage is what differentiates a Weng Kiu perspective from the Saan Kiu early adapter. Weng Kiu is represented as an enlightened understanding of all parts of the whole and the entirety of what the whole represents. It also represents an ability to physically express all principles and concepts without any preconceived notion of intent or preferences. This is a complete mastery of the current reality which is not the same as being introduced or even perfecting components of the new reality.
In summary, the Three Connecting Bridges gives us a medium for viewing our changing world. This Saam Mo Kiu perspective provides us a way to look at the reality of human form and function relative to any conflict (mental, physical, emotional) and break away from a styles perspective to focus on the universality of what it means to be human.
Secondly, the three stages are natural and qualitatively neutral. We can train to a Weng Kiu level without being Weng Kiu. We can appreciate the skills and body methods of Saan Kiu while simultaneously recognizing the difference between Saan Kiu methods and a Weng Kiu approach even though we haven’t fully achieved Weng Kiu. We can also point out a Fau Kiu perspective without demeaning or devaluing the person.
My wish is for people to develop a deeper meaning for their lives through the practice of martial arts regardless of style or approach. I hope that this post helps at least one person view their journey with a little different perspective.
David Bowman
Kalamazoo, MI
I have an essay that I wrote about the Hung Fa Yi philo back in February, and your essay inspired me to revisit mine. I decided to revise it and want to share it here as well. I want to thank you for sharing your wonderful essay with all of us.